Evaluations, diagnoses, and treatments of the different major psychological illnesses described in the abnormal psychology literature

2000 words total (including the title page and reference list but not the introduction, body, or conclusion). Any word count that is 10% over or under the allotted amount results in an immediate 10% penalty.
Penalties: In accordance with assessment rules, late assessments are subject to a 5% daily fine. Please submit your request for a delay before the deadline.

The case report’s objectives are 1, 2, and 4 of the learning objectives. As a result, the report should be written to show your practical and analytical understanding of the key elements of abnormal psychology. You must show that you have the ability to do research that expands your knowledge of the causes, evaluations, diagnoses, and treatments of the different major psychological illnesses described in the abnormal psychology literature.
Here is a list of movies you might like to see before writing your case study. It is not a comprehensive list of movies that deal with psychology, but it does include a number of movies that cover the main topics covered in the course on abnormal psychology. You must watch one movie from this list, paying attention to and evaluating various aspects of the character’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior. The narrative could be fictional or nonfictional. Your paper’s emphasis will be on the person, not the movie’s topic or plot, in order to potentially earn a good score. Questions about the environment and the individual must be included in your essay. The following is a list of these queries.
Shutter Island’s Edward “Teddy” Daniels, played by Leonardo DiCaprio; Black Swan’s Nina Sayers, played by Natalie Portman; Flight Whip Whitaker, played by Denzel Washington; Girl, Interrupted’s Susanna Kaysen, played by Winona Ryder; and Silver Linings Playbook’s Pat, played by Pat Jr. The following details are provided to help you organize your case report: Bradley Cooper Gran Torino Walt Kowalksi Clint Eastwood Gone Girl Amy Elliott Dunne Rosamund Pike We need to talk about Kevin. Kevin or Eva Khatchadourian Ezra Miller or Tilda Swinton Prozac Nation Elizabeth Wurtzel Christina Ricci The Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher Meryl Streep. A score of 100 is assigned to the case report. The Case Report Information folder on the course Moodle has a marking rubric.

• Title: Your case report must have a title that is both succinct and informative. For the purposes of this project, you can just choose to name the character and the movie you’ve watched, for example. Elizabeth Wurtzel’s Character Evaluation in Prozac Nation Your first page must be a title page that complies with APA standards.

Introduction: One paragraph (10 points). This section should include a succinct summary of the topic to be covered, clearly stated topics and essay goals, maybe your key arguments, and, if necessary, specific terms or concepts. The main goal is to give the readers enough information to understand the main points of this case study and what to expect as they read on. Introduction is not required as a heading.

• Body (50 points; see grade breakdown below): After the introduction comes the bulk of your case report. The body of your case report should contain a concise explanation of your responses to the questions that have been posed (see below for the questions), as this is how this component of the assessment will be judged. The organization of the materials is the main structural problem. The methodical organization of all pertinent materials into a presentation that is cogent, logical, and integrated is required. Regardless of the specific approach you choose, your case report would be successful if it could persuade the readers that your themes have been clearly stated and your arguments have been supported by solid evidence, whether or not they share your point of view. Please take note that, in general, a smooth flow through suitable paragraph placement helps to accomplish that purpose. Use of subheadings pertinent to each area’s queries is strongly advised.

• Conclusion (10 points) You summarize the key points in your work to bring your work to a close after presenting the essay’s body to the audience in order to show your case report’s thesis. Typically, this is no longer than two paragraphs.

• References (5 points) Be aware that the phrase “references”—not “biography”—is used in psychology assignments. This part must be included. The length of your readings is reflected in the list of references. In most circumstances, a case report with only one reference (such as your textbook) is insufficient. On the other hand, a case report with a very long reference list that includes a lot of irrelevant sources won’t be looked upon favorably either. There must be at least ten references for this assignment. Make sure that every response you give to a query is backed up with data from peer-reviewed literature.

• Style (5 points) Adhering to APA style is required. This covers language use, citation style, grammatical conventions, and other things. If you are unsure, consult your APA Manual (6th edition).

• Spelling, Grammar, Logical Flow (10 points), and Overall Impression (10 points) Be sure to write concisely and orderly. You should definitely have a friend or member of your family proofread your work, and you should also read it aloud to yourself to check for punctuation. Remember that this is an official piece of writing, so refrain from using slang or language with strong morals. Follow the formatting conventions.

These will comprise the “body” of your case report; therefore, ask these questions. Please give each question a succinct header, such as “Presenting problems and mental status examination,” “Diagnosis,” “Treatment,” etc. Keep in mind that even if you are providing answers to queries, your case report is still coherent.
1. Presenting Issues (5 points) What are the current issues? Remember that even though you can see a character at a variety of different times, you should only relate to their most recent appearance. If you have access to more than one time period, pretend that you have had the luxury of studying this client over a number of intervals. Is the character’s behavior abnormal in light of the definition(s) provided in the lecture and the textbook reading?
2. Examining the character’s mental state for 5 points What do you notice about the character? Don’t forget to apply the knowledge you gained about mental status observations from your lecture or textbook. Be mindful not to use judgmental terminology.
3. Problems the character has previously presented (5 points) How does this connect to the character’s current disturbance?
4. Environment and Period (5 marks) Do you think the character’s distress is influenced by any environmental factors? (for instance, the time period, the setting, the dysfunctional family, the therapist’s office)
5. History of prior therapy, medical history, and psychiatric history (5 points): If prior treatment was provided, was it beneficial?
6. Provide a formulation for this client (5 points). What would be the most plausible explanation for this character’s symptoms? Refer to the literature and discuss why the client is presenting with these specific issues at this time to earn good points for this section.
7. Discuss the diagnostic (5 points). Is the character in the movie given a diagnosis? Do you believe the diagnosis is accurate, if it is? What do you believe the diagnosis is if it isn’t? What other inquiries would you make, or what data would you look for to bolster your diagnosis? What diagnostic traits does your character have that would support your diagnosis according to the DSM-V tables?
8. What do you think would have helped the character evolve better, according to your proposed treatment (10 points)? Keep in mind to cite both your formulation and the relevant literature. Your selection of treatment(s) should ideally be influenced by your formulation and recommendations in the literature.

9. Does the movie reflect the character and his or her disease accurately? (5 points) Do you think “Hollywood” has twisted the facts of the case? Examine your knowledge of this disorder. PSYC13017 CASE REPORT MARKING RUBRIC INTRODUCTION (10) HIGH DISTINCTION (8.5–10 marks) DISTINCTION (7.5–8 marks) Credit (6.5–7 marks) PASS (5–6 marks) FAIL (0–4.5 marks) MARK The report’s themes and goals are discussed, and the main arguments are presented in a logical sequence. Although the concepts, goals, and arguments are provided, they are not entirely coherent. The opening lacked coherence and didn’t go into enough information about the report’s themes, goals, or arguments. The introduction lacked consistency and failed to make mention of even one or two of the report’s topics, goals, or arguments. There was no mention of any of the report’s topics, objectives, or arguments in the preface. BODY (50), HIGH DISTINCTION (4.5–5), DISTINCTION (4–5), CREDIT (3.5–5), PASS (2.5–3), FAIL (0–2), Mark: Presenting Problems (5) The client’s presenting problems are briefly described. The term “abnormality” is defined and discussed in detail, with instances drawn from the client’s actions. Although the client’s current difficulties are described, additional specificity is required. The definition and analysis of abnormalities are comprehensive. Although the client’s current issues are described, they are notably underexplained. The definition and analysis of abnormalities are comprehensive. The client’s current issues are not sufficiently handled, and there is insufficient characterization and discussion of abnormalities. There is no discussion of the client’s presenting issues or the notion of abnormality. Mental Status Examination (MSE) (score of five) The MSE comprises a brief examination of appearance and behavior, mood and affect, intellectual performance, and sensorium. Language lacks judgment. MSE discusses pertinent aspects; however, the presentation is disjointed. Language is impartial. MSE lacks cohesion and does not discuss all pertinent factors. Language is impartial. MSE does not cover every important element in detail. Sometimes language is judgmental or informal. None of the pertinent criteria are mentioned in MSE. Language is pejorative or casual. background of Presenting Problems (5) A good amount of detail and examples are used to comprehensively explore the character’s background and how it pertains to their disturbance. A reasonable amount of detail and the use of examples are used to illustrate the character’s history and how it connects to their distress. There is discussion of the character’s past and how it pertains to their disruption, but there is nothing in the way of elaboration or usage of instances. The discussion of the character’s past and how it pertains to their disturbance is brief and devoid of examples. There is no discussion of the character’s past or how it pertains to their distress. Environment and Era: (5) All era- and environment-related factors that contributed to the character’s distress are covered, making appropriate use of instances. With the help of certain examples, all historical and environmental factors that contributed to the character’s disturbance are examined. The majority of historical and environmental factors that contributed to the character’s disruption are explored with little reference to examples. There are some discussions on era- and environmental-related influences on the character’s disturbance, but no examples are used. The character’s disturbance’s influences from the environment, the era, or both are not examined. Past Treatment (5) The effectiveness and usefulness of any prior treatments, medical histories, or psychiatric histories are discussed. The effectiveness and appropriateness of any prior treatments or medical or psychiatric histories are mentioned; however, there are a few minor coherence or detail concerns. The effectiveness and appropriateness of any prior treatments or medical or psychiatric histories are reviewed, but there are significant problems with specificity or consistency. The report lacks coherence and makes no mention of one or more of the following: prior therapy, medical history, or mental history. Any mention of prior treatment, medical history, or mental history is absent from the report. Formulation (5) The formulation critically engages with pertinent literature while providing a thorough and justifiable explanation for why this character is exhibiting symptoms. The formulation makes use of pertinent material and provides a clear justification for why this character is exhibiting symptoms. The formulation uses a scant amount of pertinent material and offers a scant amount of justification for why this character is exhibiting symptoms. The statement provides a sketchy justification for why this character is exhibiting symptoms but neglects to reference any pertinent works of literature. The formulation does not explain why this character is exhibiting symptoms. Diagnosis (5) A diagnosis is established using acceptable language, or the provided diagnosis is critically assessed. Any additional information needed to support a diagnosis is discussed. The DSM-V criteria are applied, along with illustrations of the behavior that supports the diagnosis. The given diagnosis is assessed critically, or a diagnosis is produced using the correct terminology. Any additional information needed to support a diagnosis is discussed. Although there are few examples of behavior that support the diagnosis, DSM-V criteria are employed. A diagnosis is established, but there is little sign of critical thought, or the diagnosis is examined. There is no mention of any additional data needed to back up a diagnosis. Although there are few examples of behavior that support the diagnosis, DSM-V criteria are employed. The diagnosis is given, or a diagnosis is made, but no indication of critical thought is present. No mention is made of any additional data needed to establish a diagnosis. Although DSM-V criteria are mentioned, the diagnosis is not supported by any behavioral examples. Either no diagnosis is made or no diagnosis is offered. No mention is made of any additional data needed to establish a diagnosis. DSM-V criteria are not applied, or criteria from an earlier DSM version are applied. Treatment (10) Appropriate therapies and their potential to help the character develop or change are reviewed. The client’s formulation is used to support the suggested treatment(s), while pertinent literature is reviewed. The proper course of action is covered, along with how it might help the character develop or change. There are citations to pertinent works, but there is no indication of critical thought. The client’s formulation is utilized to support the suggested treatment(s). The proper course of action is covered, along with how it might help the character develop or change. There is no indication of critical thought, despite the citation of pertinent material. The client’s formulation is utilized to support the suggested treatment(s). Treatments are explored, along with how they could assist the character in growing or changing. No pertinent literature is cited. The client’s formulation does not support the proposed treatment(s). Treatments are either not discussed or explained, but not how they might benefit the character. There is no citation of pertinent material, and there is no indication of critical thought. The client’s formulation does not support the proposed treatment(s). Portrayal (5) There is a debate about the portrayal of the There is a discussion about the portrayal of the There is not enough discussion about the There is no discussion about the representation of the client’s symptoms or disorders. The utilization of instances and the ramifications of the portrayal for comprehending this diagnosis and mental illness are both excellent. signs or diseases of the client. There is some usage of illustrations and the consequences of the portrayal for comprehending these diagnostic and mental disorders. signs or diseases of the client. Examples are not used, and there is no discussion of how the portrayal affects our understanding of this diagnosis and mental disorders. a description of the client’s diseases and symptoms. The consequences of the portrayal for our knowledge of this diagnosis and mental illness are discussed incoherently and without the use of examples. a description of the client’s diseases and symptoms. There are no examples used, and there is no discussion of how the portrayal affects our knowledge of these diagnostic and mental disorders. HIGH DISTINCTION (8.5 to 10 marks), DISTINCTION (7.5 to 8 marks), CREDIT (6.5 to 7 marks), PASS (5 to 6 marks), FAIL (0 to 4.5 marks), MARK The conclusion logically and briefly summarizes the key aspects of the report. The conclusion summarizes the report’s main findings, but there are a few small coherence difficulties. The conclusion summarizes the report’s main themes, although there are serious coherence problems. The summary of the report’s main points in the end falls short. There is no conclusion, or it fails to summarize the key aspects of the study. The APA style is followed throughout. APA ADHERENCE (10) HIGH DISTINCTION (4.5–5 marks) DISTINCTION (4 marks) Credit (3.5 points) PASS (2.5–3 marks) FAIL (0–2 marks) MARK APA Referencing (5) The APA style is followed throughout. The APA style is followed throughout, with a few minor mistakes. Throughout, APA referencing is used, yet there are some significant mistakes. There are several faults and intermittent adherence to APA references. There are significant and/or insufficient APA citation errors. APA Style (5): The APA style is used consistently. The APA format is followed throughout, with a few minor mistakes. Although there are some significant flaws, the APA format is followed throughout. A large number of errors and occasional adherence to APA style can be found in academic papers. significant mistakes. WRITTEN EXPRESSION (20) HIGH DISTINCTION (8.5–10 marks) DISTINCTION (7.5–8 marks) CREDIT (6.5–7 marks) PASS (5–6 marks) FAIL (0–4.5 points) MARK Spelling, grammar, and logical flow (10) The report is clearly organized and presented with few to no grammatical or spelling mistakes. Arguments are rational and simple to follow. Minor grammar and spelling errors. Logic flows well, with a few tiny hiccups. Grammar and spelling mistakes of a major kind Despite an uncertain logical framework, the report is nonetheless readable. The report is challenging to read due to serious errors in spelling and grammar as well as a disrupted logical flow throughout. Significant errors in grammar, spelling, and logical flow make the report largely unintelligible. Overall Impression (10) The report is comprehensive and professionally produced, paying proper attention to every last detail. All pertinent issues are covered in detail. Literature is employed well, and there is strong evidence of critical and autonomous thought. All of the language is proper. The report is comprehensive and presented properly. There are a few small problems with the level of detail, examples used, independent or critical thought, or language used. The report examines all pertinent subjects and is presented adequately; however, there are serious problems with the level of detail, the use of examples, independent or critical thought, or language use. The report sufficiently covers the majority of important topics; however, there are problems with the level of depth, examples used, independent or critical thought, and language used. The study is poorly presented and does not sufficiently investigate pertinent concerns. The following aspects, including degree of detail, usage of examples, critical/independent reasoning, and language use, all have serious problems. COMMENTS, PENALTIES, AND GRADE WORD LIMIT, LATE SUBMIT, FAILURE TO TURN IN, FINAL GRADE (/100), GRADE LETTER