| Criteria |
No Submission |
Novice |
Basic |
Proficient |
Exceptional |
Criterion Score |
| Purpose (20 Points) Purpose Identifies the purpose/goal for the paper.
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
14 points
Section Points Possible (less than 15 points) Identification of purpose is vague and does not elaborate/exemplify the purpose.
|
16 points
Section Points Possible (15-16 points) Identification of purpose is vague with only limited elaboration/exemplification.
|
18 points
Section Points Possible (17-18 points) Clearly identifies the purpose of the writing, with only limited elaboration/exemplification.
|
20 points
Section Points Possible (19-20 points) Clearly identifies the purpose of the writing using elaboration/exemplification and/or the vocabulary of the discipline (as appropriate). |
/ 20
Score of Purpose (20 Points) Purpose Identifies the purpose/goal for the paper.,
|
| Information (30 Points) Information Response includes additional information to support the paper
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
23 points
Section Points Possible (less than 23 points) Information used is incomplete, incorrect, or biased.
|
25 points
Section Points Possible (23-25 points) Information used comes from reliable sources but is not appropriate to the paper.
|
28 points
Section Points Possible (26-28 points) Information used comes from reliable sources and is appropriate to the paper.
|
30 points
Section Points Possible (29-30 points) Information used comes from reliable sources within the discipline, is appropriate to the paper, and presents a coherent, clear picture. |
/ 30
Score of Information (30 Points) Information Response includes additional information to support the paper,
|
| Concepts (30 Points) Concepts Relevant terminology is included and used correctly.
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
23 points
Section Points Possible (less than 23 points) Concepts are not identified.
|
25 points
Section Points Possible (23-25 points) Concepts are identified, but not clearly defined. No attempt to elaborate/ exemplify.
|
28 points
Section Points Possible (26-28 points) Some concepts are clearly defined using elaboration/ exemplification.
|
30 points
Section Points Possible (29-30 points) All relevant concepts are clearly defined using elaboration/ exemplification. |
/ 30
Score of Concepts (30 Points) Concepts Relevant terminology is included and used correctly.,
|
| Grammar and Spelling (10 Points)
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
7 points
Section Points Possible (less than 8 points) Writer makes errors in grammar and/or spelling which significantly affect the flow the paper
|
8 points
Section Points Possible (8 points) Writer makes errors in grammar and/or spelling that make the ability to follow the paper considerably more difficult
|
9 points
Section Points Possible (9 points) Writer makes errors in grammar and/or spelling that make the ability to follow the paper more difficult
|
10 points
Section Points Possible (10 points)
Writer makes few (or no) errors in grammar or spelling that do not affect the flow or ability to follow the pape |
/ 10
Score of Grammar and Spelling (10 Points),
|
| Core Values (10 Points) ECO.202.08: Explain the relevance of Responsible Stewardship in the context of microeconomic analysis. CPC.CV.05
|
0 points
No Assignment Submitted.
|
7 points
Section Points Possible (less than 8 points) Core value(s) implied but not specifically addressed in the writing.
|
8 points
Section Points Possible (8 points) Core value(s) are specifically addressed, but do not address relevance and are not integrated throughout the paper.
|
9 points
Section Points Possible (9 points) Core value(s) are specifically addressed with relevance stated, but not integrated throughout the paper. |
