Compare and contrast any ancient myth of your choosing with any modern tale, paying particular attention to the architecture and substance of both myths (aside from any Greek myths).
Ideally, you ought to employ one of the myths that Levis-Strauss describes and dispels in The Raw and the Cooked.

All students will be given the same assignment: compare and contrast two myths, one ancient (other than a Greek story), and the other modern, paying particular attention to their respective structures and contents.
Ideally, you ought to employ one of the myths that Levis-Strauss describes and dispels in The Raw and the Cooked.
the general criteria for term papers. At least six of the ten main structural components listed below should be discussed in your analytical comparison:
1. Controversial
2. Conciliating or resolving
3. Swindlers
Messiah 4.
5. Extraordinary abilities
6. Mythologies
7. motifs or themes
8. Typical constructions
9. Dialogic methods
Triads, 10.
11. Icons
12. Recurrences
Rituals 13.
Additionally, to enable a clear structural comparison of myths, utilize a paradigm similar to the one Levi-Strauss employed in his analysis of the Ash-Boy and Cinderella when comparing the general themes of the stories.
Ash-Boy Cinderella
gender male female
Family Status: double family (father remarried) (orphan) No family
Appearance Beautiful girl, ugly boy
No one likes her unrequited love for the girl since it is sentimental.
With divine assistance, transformation was dressed beautifully and washed of its ugly parts.

1. Describe the function and location of a trickster as being halfway between two polar words, as well as their dualism or ambiguous and equivocal nature, while describing the mediating role of a trickster.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

2. Although you are required to compare no more than two myths, you are free to compare as many as you choose.

3. When appropriate, describe the mediator chains, especially as they are expressed in the first, second, and so forth triads that follow the initial pair or binary opposition.

4. Discuss Levi-Strauss’ logical myth structures as a system of psychological associations that allows people to avoid seeing uncomfortable situations.

5. Describe the specific unpleasant difficulties that the myths you are analyzing and comparing attempt to resolve.

6. Make use of no less than six academic sources that you deem relevant.

7. Show that you can analyze any myth using Levi-Strauss’s conventional structural analysis.

8. You get to choose the parameters of your study; for example, you can focus solely on a few features of the myths, give the whole context for each myth, or discuss the various versions of each myth.
1. Content and general information for research papers Students are required to conduct research and prepare a very brief essay (5 pages, typed, double-spaced) on a subject relating to the course.
By the due date, the assignment must be turned in. Email submissions won’t be taken into consideration. Every day that a paper is late, it automatically lowers its grade by 1%.

2. Format for a research paper

By the due date, the written assignment must be electronically delivered to a drop box on Connect. Late entries will automatically receive a daily grade reduction of 1%.

• Electronic submissions only (no paper copies)
Times New Roman, 12 points, double-spaced, and clearly typed or keyboarded.
• References must follow the documentation style outlined in the UBCO Style Guide for Papers in Anthropology, which is available at:

3. This English-language anthropology course uses a rubric for research papers. As a result, I anticipate receiving assignments that are written in a formal, non-sexist form of English. It’s important to use proper syntax, punctuation, spelling, presentation, logic, and argument coherence. The effectiveness with which you present and articulate your ideas, arguments, critical analyses, content, and knowledge settings is taken into account in this course’s grading procedure.

study caliber. Evidence of the student’s thorough investigation (at least six scholarly sources that have undergone peer review) (Encyclopedias, websites, and dictionaries don’t count.) 6%

A critical evaluation. The ability to convey an opinion or evaluation of the texts they are using as sources must be demonstrated by the students. Students must show they can carefully dissect and research the components of the larger subject matter they are studying. Students must show that they grasp the author’s ideas rather than just paraphrasing what they say.

1) Proper grammar and usage, punctuation, the title, citations, and works cited page, as well as rigorous proofreading, Ideally, most paragraphs will begin and/or end with a clear topic statement conveying the paragraph’s main point. 2) Clarity (clear, easily understandable prose; a clear thesis or point for each paragraph that is directly relevant to the paper’s thesis and helps move the paper’s overall project and argument forward); and 3) Creativity (varying, engrossing, and sophisticated prose). 4%

Structure and format: the paper’s logical arrangement and presentation, including the introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, and effective transitions. The instructor must approve the topic for the five-page paper that students are required to research and produce. Your name, ID number, university name, and instructor name must all appear on the cover page. The correct page numbers and a binding method must be used to join the pages. Do not just fold the corners of loose papers over to turn them in.


Additional details about the research report

• Make use of other sources to strengthen your analysis and support your claims.
• Steer clear of the Internet, dictionaries, and encyclopedias (these are not academic sources). Only the material found in the original sources is reproduced.
• Consult peer-reviewed scholarly publications, books, essays, and other equally reliable sources.
• Remember that doing a critical analysis entails using prudent judgment or an intelligent appraisal of a specific issue. Examine the topic you are talking about, its components, and how they relate.
Support your theoretical arguments with examples.
• Convey your sincere understanding of what the author is expressing.
• Include your own ideas in the paper, but make sure they are always related to the topics or problems you are tackling.
• Retain an anthropological theoretical direction to avoid having the work come off as a journalistic account or a literary analysis.
• Use analogies, comparisons, and other literary devices to support your arguments.
• To avoid any possibility of plagiarism, use as many quotations and proper citations as necessary.
• If you wish to, by all means, write in the first person. Keep in mind that knowledge does not exist in forests, mines, or the vacuum of space. We created it. Decontextualizing our writing from our own human agency is therefore pointless.
• defining words and concepts that the reader might not understand or that require more explanation.
• Before you turn in your paper, make sure someone else proofreads it.
• Number the pages and include a bibliography or references.
• Deliver your paper on time to avoid any penalties.

This is an excellent explanation of the trickster.



"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon

Order Now