COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT BRIEF

MBA Strategic Management Coursework Assignment Brief

Semester E15 Module Code PM103 Module Title Management Information and Communication Systems (MICS) Temporary Level: Level 7
Neil McLellan, the University of Plymouth’s module leader, is the awarding body.

Task of Assessment Business communication and information flow

Create a formal report in which you critically assess the function of ERP and CRM systems in a chosen organization.
Describe the role that wireless networks and other forms of networks have in involving various divisions within the company or other companies.
Describe and critically examine the business processes that the ERP and CRM systems support, including the flow of data and information.
Determine what shape the information may take, how management and other users might use it tactically and strategically, and discuss any problems with mobile devices and BYOD.
Declare your findings and offer the required advice.

Word report format for assessments
No presentation
Any unique specifications: All assignments must be uploaded to the student portal with a respectable Word limit for Turnitin Reports: 3,000
Submission deadline is Wednesday, December 2, 2015, at noon.
The learning outcomes of this assessment will look at Recognizing the MICS’s nature, content, and role in management decision-making.
Analyze the MICS strategy in various organizational types.
Show how MICS may integrate different management functions to improve an organization’s overall performance.

assessment standards Explanatory remarks on the evaluation standards Maximum points allowed in each part
style, relevancy, creativity, and content use a variety of recent journal articles to offer a clear and thorough overview of the situation. 30
Format, citation, and bibliography Professional report formatted, fully utilizing the Harvard Reference System 20
Critically constructive analysis, introduction, and conclusion Indicate how management decisions have an impact on the outcomes and demonstrates a clear analysis and evaluation of the findings 50

When putting together their tasks, students should adhere to the rules of the aforementioned assessment framework. For the purpose of assisting and directing students in the production of their work, the pertinent assessment criteria have been given. It should be shown that the learning objectives were met and that applicable theories were applied to the assessment activity.
How to format the report on an assignment
Name Page
Title of the assignment, Module Code, Student Code, Full Name, and Submission Date.
All the chapters, sections, headers, and subheadings are listed in the table of contents. Figures and Appendices should be included, along with as many page numbers as possible.
Introduction
This gives a general summary of the subject under consideration and your methodology.
Findings and Analysis • This is where your report’s meat will be. Depending on the material being presented, the structure will change. Use headings and subheadings to clearly identify the various sections.
• The headers situation, problem, solution, and evaluation may help to create structure. To simply describe a scenario is insufficient. Critical thinking and analysis are crucial.
• You can support your points with graphs, diagrams, and tables, however, it might be wiser to attach the more sophisticated ones.
Conclusions
These elucidate the consequences of your findings. Based on the information in the findings and analysis, deductions are made. Don’t forget to leave out any brand-new information.
Recommendations
Describe the exact steps you believe need to be taken to enhance or develop the situation. Highlight the actionable steps.
References This is a list of all the names of the sources that you cited or copied text from for your report. Please cite all sources according to The Harvard System.
Bibliography
It includes all of the reading you did in order to write the report but did not use it as a source. It enables the reader to evaluate whether prior reading was utilized from a variety of courses and was balanced.
Appendices
Detailed explanations of the findings’ points. Technical data, surveys, letters that were sent, tables, charts, and brochures are a few examples. The supplemental material that you feel is too lengthy, complex, or not quite relevant to present in the report’s main part but is nonetheless important to your reader is contained in an appendix. You should make references to each appendix in your content. If a topic is not covered in the report, it should not be an appendix.

Guide for marking assignments

Criteria Fail (less than 50%) Pass (50-59%) Suitable Pass (60-69%) Distinction (70% or more)
Identify the issue or activity at hand and use a methodical approach with goals in mind. does not understand or take on the task or challenge. Lack of a specific goal and a scant investigation of potential solutions to the issue or task. broadly covers the subject or goal, but lacks clarity or gives only cursory attention to contextual factors. Some explanation of the investigation’s methodology. handles the issue or task in a clear manner and exhibits an understanding of contextual factors and the effects of change. Clearly defined goals. considered defending research techniques. Clearly states the issue or task, discusses it, shows a thorough understanding of contextual factors, and acknowledges any potential challenges presented by change. comprehensive defense of the research techniques.
references and supporting information There is not much proof that any references to recent research or best practices have been made. Some application of current research or best practices to the issue or task. The strategy used to deal with the problem or task is supported by a clear and adequate utilization of pertinent literature and current practice. a critical assessment of the reliability and value of the literature. to serve as a baseline, including recent research findings. Utilizing current research, relevant literature, and best practices in order to fully address the issue or task. The work is supported at every level by references to pertinent sources. evaluates what he or she has read holistically, critically, and analytically, taking into account the methodological constraints of study findings.
Information gathering and evaluation inadequate information gathering and analysis. rather than analytical, be descriptive. No connection between theory and practice. adequate data gathering, analysis, and application to the issue or task. Some connections between the analysis and pertinent literature. competent information gathering that is analyzed and used to find and fix problems. Analyzing organizational practices critically, including comparing HRM practices in other organizations to those of the writers, and connecting the analysis to pertinent research. comprehensive collection of data that has been carefully analyzed and applied to the task or problem at hand. incorporates a wide range of ideas and viewpoints on the subject while adopting a critical but constructive stance, including analysis and assessment of cutting-edge and creative practices in other organizations.
final result or conclusion.
conclusions or a result that is unrelated to the data gathered. contains some actions or observations that are not supported. Conclusions or the ultimate result are pretty logical and generally flow from the information gathered. From the facts gathered, logical conclusions or the ultimate result were produced.
contains most of the important problems. Conclusions or final results are formed rationally and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the data gathered. Conclusions or results that are specific and well-backed by analysis. Potential obstacles/difficulties are discovered, and any significant issues are resolved.
Recommendations The facts do not imply any recommendations. There is no examination of viability and simplicity. unable to make intelligent recommendations. Although generally sensible and useful, recommendations still need some work to be implemented well. The recommendations are pertinent and implementable. Some consideration of the effects on resources, such as money, time, and training. Practical and well-thought-out proposals that take into account the implications of implementation in terms of viability (resources, competencies, and capability) and acceptability to key stakeholders, as well as how this might be accomplished (change management, influencing techniques), are needed.