In this activity, unlike in other discussions requiring you to respond to two peers, you will be reviewing only one peer\’s writing plan. The topics and viewpoints presented in your peers\’ writing plans do not necessarily reflect the views of SNHU. Because SNHU values academic freedom, a range of topics relevant to the assignment prompt are explored in this class. Please note that you are not assigned to comment on a specific peer\’s work. If you are uncomfortable commenting on a particular topic, please select a different post that you feel comfortable responding to.
Exploring persuasive topics can often mean investigating opinions and ideas that are different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.
Now that you have finished watching a video on the peer review process, let us put what you learned into practice! For this activity, you will use discussion prompts to help review one of your peer\’s submissions of Project One: Writing Plan. Your review will focus specifically on your peer\’s main argument, potential challenges, and integration of evidence. As stated in the video, it is important to be honest and thorough during the peer review process. Your job is to help your peer determine how clear their intended argument is and how well the sources they have found support that argument.
Create one initial post and follow up with ONE response post.
For your initial post, do the following:
- Copy and paste your Writing Plan into the discussion forum.
- Complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
For your response post, do the following:
- Select one post made by another student to evaluate. Try to find a student who has not had any feedback. Reply to one classmate outside of your own initial post thread.
- For this module, complete your one response post by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Read through your peer\’s post carefully, and then address the following prompts:
- State your peer\’s argument about the persuasive topic.
- How can your peer address the challenges that were identified about convincing your peer\’s audience?
- Offer one research or writing suggestion to help meet your peer\’s identified goal.
- What evidence would convince you as a reader?
Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and your response post to your classmate.
To complete this assignment, review the Module Four Discussion Rubric.
Save your time – Order a paper now!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper here https://essaysprompt.com/order/
Course Name; Course Code
Diversity In Criminal Justice System
The world is saturated with diverse cultural beliefs, races, opinions, and religions affecting individual interactions globally. The criminal justice system has suffered immensely from cultural differences, culminating in racial profiling and judicial biasness against a particular group. These defects in the judicial system have been served by stereotyping and biasness against minority groups, thereby limiting justice in their favor.
Cultural diversity awareness serves as the hallmark for bridging the gap in the delivery of justice (Boehnlein). Through information dissipation and the inclusion of people from various cultures, a clear understanding of cultural differences can be attained, assuaging stereotypical views. Stereotypes have the ability to alter individual cognition; while the administration of justice depends on evidence, individual assumptions and preoccupations could alter the interpretation of evidence; consequently, this could result in altered discretion from judges.
Exposure to cultural diversity instills a feeling of inclusivity among victims of unfair criminal justice, and this decreases the rate of racial profiling and unfair judgments against minority groups. Firstly, it leads to the adoption of the Schmidtz elements of justice; desert, equality, reciprocity, and the need to establish justice (Boehnlein). Secondly, it delimits the application of general beliefs in the administration of justice by drifting people away from biased beliefs, instilling cultural sensitivity, and promoting respect for individual races, cultures, ethnicity, and opinions.
Boehnlein, James K et al.; cultural considerations in the criminal law: the sentencing process. The journal of The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.33,3 2019: 335-41
Get a similar assignment here https://essaysprompt.com/order/