Read Case 7: Handling Disparate Information for Evaluating Trainees on pages 440-441 in your textbook. Thoroughly answer each of the questions below regarding Case 7: Handling Disparate Information for Evaluating Trainees in a total of 500-750 words. Use one to two scholarly resources to support your answers. Use in-text citations when appropriate, according to APA formatting.

1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

2. How are APA Ethical Standards 1.08, 3.04, 3.05, 3.09, 7.04, 7.05, and 7.06 and the Hot Topics “Ethical Supervision of Trainees in Professional Psychology Programs” (Chapter 10) and “Multicultural Ethical Competence” (Chapter 5) relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

3. What are Dr. Vaji’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify the ethical theory (discussed in Chapter 3) guiding your decision?

4. What steps should Dr. Vaji take to implement his decision and monitor its effect?

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success enter.

NOTE: Textbook from extract  Decoding the Ethics CodeA Practical Guide for Psychologists Fourth Edition Celia B. FisherCenter for Ethics Education, Fordham University Sage publication

decoding-the-ethics-code-a-practical-guide-for-psychologists-4e1-pdf

decoding-the-ethics-code-a-practical-guide-for-psychologists-4e2-pdf

decoding-the-ethics-code-a-practical-guide-for-psychologists-4e3-pdf

decoding-the-ethics-code-a-practical-guide-for-psychologists-4e-pdf