How does a Federal court decide on the admissibility of scientific testimony?

 

How does a Federal court decide on the admissibility of scientific testimony?

 

 

 

Paper details 

There are two articles which the writer must read. Then based on those two articles, the writer is required to answer four questions (given).
In the article by Larson entitled œEpidemics of mold poisoning past and present, read the section on œStachybotrys chartarum. Also read the article entitled: œToxic Mold, Part II: Expert Witness and Scientific Testimony Issues Concerning Mold Litigation in State and Federal Courts. Prepare a written response to the following questions.
1. How does a Federal court decide on the admissibility of scientific testimony?
2. In a case heard in Federal court that alleges detrimental health effects resulting from exposure to toxic mold, what must the plaintiff establish in order to gain a favorable judgment?
3. Briefly describe the controversy concerning the use of œdifferential diagnosis to establish the cause of harm in toxic exposure cases.
4. Describe a study that would allow us to better characterize the potential health effects of toxic mold on humans?

Do you have an assignment on this question. We can create a custom

Solution for you.

order-png-image
order-png-image

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now