How does the campaign address the problem? What social economic political and ideological theories does (or did) the campaign employ?

Legal Ethical and/or Professional Case Review for Week 5
1. Identify a Legal Ethical and/or Professional Dilemma relevant for integrated care settings related to one of the following topics: billing reimbursement coding documentation or a high risk dilemma (e.g.: suicidal homicidal malpractice public relations concerns quality assurance diagnostic).
2. Identify differing professionals or ethical lenses for the dilemma to be viewed through.
3. Write a short 1-2 page summary (not including title or reference pages) addressing the following headings: Introduction of the Dilemma How the Dilemma is Typically Addressed and How the Dilemma Is Handled with Shared Decision Making
Legal Ethical and/or Professional Case Review Rubric
Criteria/Points
Excellent
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Paper Structure/Writing Style
Length (not including title and reference pages)
References: Minimum of 2 references
1. Length: 1-2 pages not including title and reference pages
2. References are integrated throughout paper to support/provide justification for student critique.
3. Cited primary sources and included course texts
4. Included title and reference page
(1 point)
One of the below is met:
1. Length: 3-4 pages
2. Integrated references with limited rationale so that literature does not clearly support student opinion. Citations consist of mostly secondary sources
3. Did not include title or reference page
(.5 point)
1. Length: More than 4 pages
2. No references
3. No title or reference page
(0 points)
APA Format
and required headings
Used required headings of:
Introduction of the Dilemma
How the Dilemma is Typically Addressed
How the Dilemma Is Handled with Shared Decision Making
Correct APA format with only 1-2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. References cited and/or reference list only contains 1-2 errors
(1 points)
Very good attempt at APA format with only 3-5 grammatical and/or spelling errors. References cited and/or reference list contains 3-5 errors
and/or did not use required headings
(.5 point)
Poor attempt at APA format with more than 6 grammatical errors or APA format not used; grammatical & spelling errors great enough to confuse the meaning of sentence and/or paper. References not cited in body of paper and/or no reference list (0 points)
Paper Content
Introduction and Summary of Ethical Legal and/or Professional Dilemma
What of the Dilemma
Why of the Dilemma
1.Described the ethical legal and/or professional dilemma. .
2.Address autonomy beneficence nonmaleficence and/or justice. .
3.Integrated care dilemma.
(3 points)
One of the below is met:
1. Dilemma is vague
2. Described dilemma without using ethical principles (autonomy beneficence nonmaleficence and/or justice).
3. Not an integrated care dilemma.
4. Missed identifying a significant ethical legal or professional dilemma associated with the described case example.
(2 points)
Described without clear indication of whys and what the dilemma is.
(1 points)
How this Dilemma is Typically Addressed without shared decision making or case review
Consequences of individualized decision making in integrated care
e.g. Confidentiality consent legal physical and/or emotional harm professional scope of practice culture power financial public relations business concerns
1.Identified the ethical codes or principles of the professionals who are involved .
2.Describe how each different integrated care professional would handle the dilemma/ their decision making.
3.Identified alternative choices.
4.Identify the consequences to individualized decision making or non-shared review and understanding of integrated care practice ethics professionalism and/or legal considerations.
(6 points)
One of the below is met:
1.Described without being concise or clear. .
2.Only addressed medical or behavioral (did not address multiple types of integrated care professionals).
3.Did not address consequences.
(4 points)
1.Described in vague terms.
2.Without clear indication of how this issues is typically addressed.
3.Without understanding of consequences to non-shared decision making.
(0-3 points)
How the Dilemma is handled with shared decision making and review
1.Decision making addresses shared medical and behavioral ethical legal and/or professional considerations.
2.Identified how the decision reduces conflict and consequences.
(4 points)
One of below is met:
1.Lacking integrated care perspective.
2.Did not identify how decision reduces conflict or consequences.
(3 points)
1.Lacking integrated care perspective.
2.Did not identify how decision reduces conflict or consequences.
(1 points)
Total Points: ____/15
.
2. Assignment Submission
Text Submission

Meredith S. Murphy September 18, 2017
Public Health Order Description Report on a public health campaign. is Breast Ca
Public Health
Order Description
Report on a public health campaign. is Breast Cancer ( Breast Screening )
assignment should be contain:
Executive summary
Commonality
Population
Risk factors
Campaign Approach
Analysis of Campaign
Future action
References ( Should be from 2010 onward )
Also when give citation needs to give PAGE NUMBER as well.
Assignment needs to be addressed to all the following questions:
How common is the health issue in Australia?
What is its distribution of the problem in the population? Are particular population groups more at risk? If so which groups?
What are the risk factors? How can the problem be prevented?
How does the campaign address the problem? What social economic political and ideological theories does (or did) the campaign employ?
Is the campaign working or did it work? Critique the campaign using evidence and relevant social economic political and ideological theories.
What more needs to be done to reduce the problem and why?