Key Assignment: Citizenship LLO 1.4 (Pending) and Ethical Practice 5.2 Search the Web Critique


Organizational leaders must be able to locate and analyze data from a number of sources. The internet is a good resource for knowledge, but as a participating member of the community, you must also be able to analyze and evaluate material to determine its accuracy and suitability. Participants will investigate and assess websites that reflect their experience in a community (a website relevant to ethics within their professional field: medical, business, social service, science, etc.) in order to develop these analytical and evaluative abilities. The identification and discussion of any ethical flaws detected on the website must be part of your critique. The results for this task are specified in the grading rubric. You must exhibit knowledge of your own and other people’s ethical principles, as well as the capacity to spot ethical difficulties and reach moral conclusions.

Each participant will select one site during the second week of the course and send an email to the facilitator asking permission to lead that search. Consider the following factors while choosing a website (see Venn Diagram): Your involvement in a professional or civic community, relevant writings about that community or the topics covered on the website, and the significance of the cohorts’ capacity to interact with the website are the first three factors. Five requests will be accepted and fulfilled in the order they are received. The same site may not be criticized by more than one person. Each seminar will have a “Search the Web” discussion thread with links to the websites that week’s lesson will cover. The facilitator will keep an open dialogue throughout the weekly Search the Web Discussion, in which he or she will choose a leader for each of the websites that week that will be analyzed. The course material being delivered to the cohort should be criticized. The leader of the Search the Web Critique is required to create a Word document (2–3 pages) with a written critique that follows APA style and format. The message will be created by the leader with the name of the website in the subject line, the critique included, and a question posted that will encourage further discussion and interaction based on that website and its critique. The discussion regarding the content on that website will be facilitated by the participant leader. Everyone in the cohort is required to read critiques and take part in discussion at least once each week.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Information from the web discussion, such as how your collaborative activity has affected your thinking, should be included in the final critique (four to five pages) that you submit. Include a site citation in APA format for electronic references, a description of the site’s contents, suggestions for how to use the information there, and an assessment of the site’s quality, veracity, usefulness, and usability, including who might find it useful and how easy it is to use. Include in your analysis how this website adds to your sense of community, whether it offers opportunities for teamwork, and how your understanding of history and the wider world gives the content on the website context and meaning.

Reviews should include a citation of the website in APA format for electronic references, a description of its contents, suggestions for how to use the information therein, and an assessment of the website’s usefulness, veracity, and quality, as well as who might find it useful and how easy it is to use. To assess the reliability of the website, consult “Evaluating sources and taking notes” in The Everyday Writer: Research Section.

The minimal passing grade for this assignment is a 3 on the 1.4 Community Involvement and 5.2 Ethical Practice LLO rubrics. A student will fail the assignment and not earn credit for the LLO if they do not achieve the required LLO score. To gain credit for these writings, you must submit them to both Chalk and Wire and eLearn.

The following characteristics will also be taken into consideration when evaluating reports and dialogue management throughout the critique: Program Learning Outcomes 1 and 2 Scores 1–5 will be graded and evaluated using the methodology below.

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon

Order Now