Minimum 2-page double-spaced font size 12 summary of this article: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404612004034
Use below to answer the 2-page summary
Objective and goals of the investigation
The context in which this work is relevant
Description of the study
What theories or models was the study based on? (USE HEALTH BELIEF MODEL SEE ATTACHMENT)
Analytical or experimental methods used
Brief description of results
Main conclusions of paper
How could this article or investigation be improved?
Look up 2 articles referenced at the end of the original article. Articles must be from the last 5 years. Write a paragraph for each article describing why the author referenced them. (USE THESE TWO ARTICLES TO DESCRIBE WHY THE AUTHOR REFERENCED THEM
Include at the end of the summary 8 technical terms with definitions:
Make a list of 8 technical terms that are unfamiliar to you and find their definitions. If you are familiar with all terms, think about terms your peers may not be familiar with.
At the end of your assignment, be sure to cite all three articles. Use correct JNEB reference style. See below regarding how to do this.
To cite an online source, provide the following information in this order and format: Name of author/agency. Title of document. URL. Accessed month and date, year. Example: National Cancer Institute. Cancer Health Disparities. www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/disparities. Accessed September 15, 2008. GRADING CRITERIA:10%: Technical Writing, Organization, and Communication 50%: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis Full credit for finding the 2 references that are from scholarly journals that your articlereferenced from the last 5 years, and including a summary of each referenced article.10% Published correctly and high-resolution picture relates well to article chosen.
I POSTED TWO EXAMPLES ON HOW TO DO THIS CORRECTLY SEE ATTACHED
10% All three article citations use correct JNEB reference style.
20%: Literature Search
Full credit for technically sophisticated summaries and explanations that are written in your own words, and demonstrate clear understanding of concepts presented in the paper.
Full credit for strong, grammatically correct technical writing, clear organization of report, easy to read figures and tables, and meaningful and compelling reasoning.