Ethics reflection paper

Ethics reflection paper

Ethical Analysis Paper Based on Rebecca Skloot’s book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks and Appendix B of the Code of Ethics for Health Education Professions Directions: This task involves reflection. Answer the following questions while addressing the issues with each component of the Code of Ethics. Put whole sentences. Describe how this incident violated each of the ten ethical principles from THE CODE OF ETHICS that are stated below. In addition, respond to the questions. At the conclusion, add your observations. 5 points for each question for a total of 100.

Article I, Section 1, Article I, Section 6, Article II, Section 2, Article II, Section 5, Article III, Section 4, Article V, Section 1, Section 2, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Section 6, and Article V, Section 7,
Do TeLinde and Gey have the legal authority to get a sample of Henrietta Lack’s cervical tissue for scientific purposes?
What information is required for informed consent, strictly?
Do you believe Henrietta would have granted permission for a tissue sample to be used in a medical study?
What rights were violated by giving Henrietta Lacks’ medical records to the media without their permission or those of their family?
Question: Susan Hsu was told by Dr. McKusick to get in touch with Henrietta’s children in order to obtain blood samples for “further HeLa research.” Was this a moral demand? Aware consent was given, right? If not, why not?
Do you think Henrietta would have had a different medical experience if she had been white? Examine the case involving John Moore (Mo). Compare the two instances.
Your thoughts on this moral conundrum.


The medical study incident that was depicted in Rebecca Skloot’s book, “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks,” broke numerous healthcare ethics rules. Poor African woman Henrietta Lacks suffered from cervical cancer. Without her knowledge or consent, scientists harvested her cells in 1951 (Skloot, 2017). Over the years, her cells have been utilized in crucial and ground-breaking medical research, from cloning to the discovery of a polio vaccine. She never received recognition for her contributions in spite of this since her family could not afford insurance. 1. Section 1 of Article I The scientists and researchers in the novel depicted as being involved in the collection of Lacks’ cells were racialized, unjust, and dishonest. Being discriminatory, they neglected to compensate the family of an African-American slave whose cells were extracted. 2. Article I Section 6 The medical staff was unaware of the racial diversity of Lacks. They breached her right to privacy and informed consent despite knowing about the difficulties black Americans faced at the time. Despite the success of Lacks’ cells, they were unable to help her family financially. 3. Article II Section 2 The medical staff concerned in Lacks’ case acted carelessly…[Click here to buy the complete response]

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon

Order Now